Time and Bits: Re: Preservation of digital information

Re: Preservation of digital information

[ Home ][ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]Stewart Brand
Thu, 26 Feb 1998 10:46:37 -0800

Next message: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"
Previous message: Tom Ditto: "Re: Aspects of digital preservation"
In reply to: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"

At 10:02 AM -0800 2/26/98, Brewster Kahle wrote:
>as an archival identifier, we use the time (fully spelled out in GMT,
>19980212034621) plus the URL. That turns out to be an easy and effective
>identifier that does not involve everyone employing a new system.

Is that a universal time-stamp? Do other digital archivists here use other
formats?

Next message: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"
Previous message: Tom Ditto: "Re: Aspects of digital preservation"
In reply to: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"
Next in thread: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"

Reply: Brewster Kahle: "Re: Preservation of digital information"