Re: Golden Canon thought

[ Home ][ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]
Danny Hillis
Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:57:55 -0800


Has anyone ever heard of a not-for-profit getting into trouble for
archiving information?
-danny

At 5:41 AM -0500 2/19/98, Esther Dyson wrote:
>You're in danger of getting involved with some nasty legal issues here.
>Many IP owners lack a sense of humor. SImply not charging users is not
>enough to qualify for fair use. Whether the law makes sense or not is a
>different matter, but it would be a shame to get tied up with these knots.
>
>Esther
>
>At 09:38 PM 2/18/98 -0800, Kevin Kelly wrote:
>>>1) Would it be best to start with documents in the
>>>public domain?
>>>
>>>2)Would it be practical to obtain individual permissions
>>>from intellectual property owners?
>>>
>>>3) Would it be best to create a situation where copyright
>>>holders proactively offer a free licence to the Canon?
>>
>>
>>I'd use a generous notion of fair use. Experimental, not for profit, for
>>research purposes only.
>>
>>At worse, I'd consider the Golden Canon trying to shape copyright
>>understanding.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Kevin Kelly
>>Wired magazine 520 3rd Street San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
>>+
>>
>>The full text of my book OUT OF CONTROL can be found at
>>http://www.well.com/user/kk/OutOfControl/
>>
>>My next book on the NEW RULES OF THE NEW ECONOMY will be published in the
>>fall of 98 by Viking/Penguin.
>>
>>
>
>
>Esther Dyson, chairman Always make new mistakes!
>EDventure Holdings
>
>
>
>104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets)
>New York, NY 10011 USA
>http://www.edventure.com
>PC Forum: March 22 to 25, 1998, Tucson, Arizona
>
>My new book is called "Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age."
>It is published by Broadway Books in the US, Viking/Penguin in the UK
>and various other publishers in other locations,
>supported by a Website -- http://www.Release2-0.com.